![]() Perhaps Hindus or Buddhists wouldn’t as their religious claims regarding the afterlife and a singular God’s judgement are significantly less clear. The same for Christians all over the world. To put some meat on the bones, if you tell a Muslim that Christians will go to the same heaven that they will, it’s not hard to imagine that they would be offended. They can’t all be true, so universalism cannot possibly be true. Why? Because religious truth claims necessarily cancel each other out. It is telling everyone that their religious claims - provided they are exclusive - are wrong. Rather than being non-judgmental, it is really the height of arrogance. But this, in fact, is a logical impossibility and it doesn’t take seriously the real diversity of other truth claims. It tries to be an affirmation that all faith claims are correct. It pretends to be a lack of such judgment. ![]() They think they are being kind by accepting the faiths of others and they see it as a no-lose scenario.īut what is universalism really if not a denigration of the beliefs of others? It claims to solve the problem of religious judgment. They have absorbed this de facto aspect of our culture and, in an effort not to come across as judgmental, they’ve incorporated it into their false Christianity. While there are official Universalists, the truth is that many Christians - who should not be universalists - have embraced it to avoid confrontation or, again, to virtue signal their boldness in throwing off old categories. Universalism, of course, is the only game in town that allows for such an end game. It is necessary that the end game of life is as free from judgement as our own politically correct and relativistic earth-bound life. Universalism, or the belief that all people of any faith have heaven available to them, is a linchpin of liberal thought because it allows for the erasing of classical boundaries that are now thought of as “judgmental”. Whites on the left tend to cry it the most, perhaps to shield themselves against the possibility of engaging in it, or to virtue signal so they can’t ever be accused of a sin so great.īut it struck me recently that one of the chief claims of liberalism at large - and in particular theological liberalism - is truly guilty of white privilege. But I do deny that it surely doesn’t exist every time and in every place someone says it does. That’s probably because I am white and would prefer not to draw attention to its reality, or perceived reality. OMD have staged multiple tours based around the album.I am not generally prone to call things “white privilege”. The record became a commercial success, selling over four million copies and spawning three international hit singles – " Souvenir", " Joan of Arc" and " Maid of Orleans" – which together sold eight million copies. Architecture & Morality has also featured in "all-time" lists, including the book, 1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die. It has been recognised as a seminal album of its era and the synth-pop genre, appearing in rankings of the best records of 1981 and the wider decade. The record met with lukewarm reviews, but garnered acclaim from critics and other artists in the following years. Released: 17 June 1982 ( Benelux only) Īrchitecture & Morality reached number three on the UK Albums Chart, and was a top-10 entry across Europe. " Maid of Orleans (The Waltz Joan of Arc)".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |